Airborne, Seadwellers and Landlubbers Lives
Gestation Crates: No Way To Treat A Pigby Robyn Thunderchild art/Greg Rebis
<!––>She can’t walk freely in a sun-splashed meadow. She can’t root about in the dirt, as is customary for her species. She can’t socialize with others of her kind, or form family bonds, or raise her young in the manner which nature intended. In fact, she can’t even turn around.
For breeding sows on modern factory farms, there are only endless months of confinement, trapped inside a narrow device commonly referred to as a gestation crate. Beneath their feet, slatted floors allow their feces and urine to drop down into large pits, where they collect until periodic removal. Toxic fumes and bacteria abound in the air, and sunlight does not reach inside the cavernous warehouses that serve as grim prisons for these helpless animals. With no regard for the comfort or natural tendencies of these intelligent, sensitive creatures, factory farmers systematically subject them to deprivation that is almost beyond imagination. Sows are impregnated over and over, and spend much of their lives locked inside gestation crates, which isolate them within the claustrophobic confines of the steel bars surrounding their immobilized bodies.
After giving birth, the mother pigs are then transferred to farrowing crates for a brief lactation period, then impregnated once again, and returned to the gestation crate to continue the cycle. When they are eventually worn out, and unable to produce further offspring, they are slaughtered. In most cases the spent bodies of these hapless animals become low-grade pork products, such as pepperoni and sausage. And so, a miserable existence ends in a violent death.
Beyond the physical rigors of gestation crates, there is, for these highly social animals, a terrible psychological toll, as well. According to an excerpt from a scientific report compiled by Farm Sanctuary on the welfare of sows in gestation crates, “the lack of environmental stimulation in the stall environment and the sows’ inability to perform normal behaviors leads to psychological disorders including chronic stress, depression, frustration, aggression, as well as abnormal and neurotic coping behaviors called stereotypies.”
In short, the extreme confinement and frustration of life in a gestation crate slowly drives these pigs into deep psychological distress, even psychosis. Chronic, manic behaviors such as bar-biting, ‘sham chewing’, and aggressiveness are common. It is not difficult to imagine why these behaviors are exhibited; pigs have been shown to share many similarities with humans, both physically and in cognitive terms. When permitted the opportunity, they form close social and familial bonds. They mate and remain together, taking great care in the nurturing of their young. Yet in the life of a pig trapped in factory breeding facilities, all this is taken away. No wonder the prisoners of gestation crates eventually go mad.
In the relentless pursuit of greater profits, the animal agribusiness industry has stripped these inquisitive animals of every freedom and instinctive behavior. In order to counteract the illnesses and infections which inevitably result from such intensive confinement in unsanitary conditions, and in an effort to further maximize their investment, factory farmers administer massive non-therapeutic doses of antibiotics to the animals, making them gain weight at a freakish pace. Overuse of antibiotics leads to the emergence of antibiotic-resistant germs. These antibiotics are then passed on to humans when they eat pork products, and the result is the reduced effectiveness of antibiotics administered for the treatment of illness in the human population.
In fact, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently expressed alarm that antibiotics have become 17% less effective in treating pneumonia germs in recent years. The CDC places the blame squarely upon the animal agribusiness industry, which consumes over 50% of all antibiotics administered in the U.S. today.
For the sows caught in this unhealthy cycle, there is only the monotonous isolation of the crate, chronic illness, foot and leg ailments caused by standing on slatted floors, and the certainty of an early demise. While so many Americans delight in the Hollywood portrayals of winsome, lovable pigs scampering about on various barnyard adventures, the tragic reality is far removed. While most of us cannot help but smile at the thought of these big, playful animals rolling and wallowing in a mud puddle, the industry holds no such regard for them. In fact, one industry executive, L.J. Taylor, export development manager for the Wall’s Meat Company, Ltd., in National Hog Farmer Magazine, stated nonchalantly,
“The breeding sow should be thought of, and treated as, a valuable piece of machinery whose function is to pump out baby pigs like a sausage machine.”
Another executive said,
“Forget the pig is an animal. Treat him just like a machine in a factory. Schedule treatments like you would lubrication. Breeding season like the first step in an assembly line. And marketing like the delivery of finished goods.”-J. Byrnes, “Raising Pigs by the Calendar at Maplewood Farm,” from Hog Farm Management Magazine.
Still another, Earl Ainsworth, “Revolution in Livestock Breeding on the Way” from Farm Journal, remarked,
“Estrus control will open the doors to factory hog production. Control of female cycles is the missing link to the assembly line approach.”
Clearly, to an industry bent upon making money and unconcerned with the welfare of these living, feeling animals, it is all a matter of dollars and cents. The confinement, the diseases, the manic behaviors that set in after prolonged deprivation, are not considered to be reasons for concern. In intensive hog-breeding operations, life is reduced to the level of commodity, and suffering is not given any consideration. In fact, many in the industry seek to convince us that gestation crates do not represent suffering for the animals at all. In a major front-page expose on modern hog-farms by a Washington Post reporter (“In Pig Farming, Growing Concern: Raising Sows in Crates Is Questioned” by Marc Kaufman, Washington Post staff writer, Monday, June 18, 2001), National Pork Council Vice-President and veterinarian Paul Sundberg was quoted as follows:
“Science tells us that she [a sow] doesn’t even seem to know that she can’t turn…She wants to eat and feel safe, and she can do that very well in individual stalls.”
Such statements demonstrate the industry’s ongoing attempts to justify to an uneasy public the methods currently employed in factory farming operations, including gestation crates.
However, there is a rising tide of protest against these methods. In Europe, gestation crates have been outlawed, as a result of public outcry and concerted campaigns by groups and individuals concerned about the obvious welfare and ethical concerns raised by these cruel devices. Here in the United States, as more Americans become aware of the horrors of gestation crates and all that these systems entail, similar efforts to ban the crates are underway.
Currently, groups involved in humane farming issues are working to ban gestation crates in the state of Florida. The Animal Rights Foundation of Florida, the Humane Society of the U.S., and Farm Sanctuary are spearheading the effort to place an initiative on the 2002 ballot of that state, which if passed would outlaw gestation crates. These and other concerned parties have organized to form Floridians for Humane Farms, and are now gathering signatures across the state.
As a stark example of the alarming trend by corporate agribusiness towards the commodification of life, disrespect for the environment, and callous disregard for ethical concerns, the gestation crate is a tragic benchmark of an irresponsible methodology. To a consuming public once largely ignorant of such barbaric developments, it represents an awakening to the horrors of factory farming. Few could witness the suffering of a sow locked inside this device without being moved to outrage. Perhaps, then, it is fitting that gestation crates serve as the cruel indignity which ultimately moves citizens to speak out against such practices, and to understand that the time has come to closely examine our attitudes toward, and treatment of, these gentle creatures who inhabit our legends, our imagination, and our land. If so, perhaps there is relief in sight for the millions of pigs waiting silently in narrow, cramped crates in warehouses across America. For only we can help them, and if we do not, they have no hope at all.•
Email your feedback on this article to firstname.lastname@example.org.
So called environmentalist, Richard Branson, has made this comment: ” Climate change is a good opportunity to make Money”. He sees also environmentalism as a good source of making Money.
He’s using an environmental agenda to cover up questionable business practices
I dag presenterar forskarna nya siffror över antalet vargar i Sverige. Under de senaste åren har den svenska vargstammen vuxit konstant och många förväntar sig en ökning även i år.
Vid vargsymposiet i Vålådalen i Jämtland där årets siffror presenteras kommer också danska forskare att närvara. Efter att ha varit borta från den danska faunan i 199 år har vargen nu återvänt till Danmark.
The Fisheries Agency has decided to increase protection for bluefin tuna amid international concerns about declining stocks, according to major media, including the Yomiuri Shimbun and the Mainichi Shimbun.
Studies have found stocks of bluefin tuna, prized by sushi lovers, have fallen dramatically, with juveniles forming the majority of specimens now being caught, pushing the species closer to extinction.
Last year, an international conference involving Japan agreed to cut each nation’s quota for juvenile bluefin tuna in 2014 by more than 15 percent from the 2002-2004 average, according to Kyodo News.
But Japan, the world’s biggest tuna consumer, has concluded bluefin tuna stocks will not sufficiently increase unless the quota is significantly reduced, the Yomiuri said.
The Japanese plan is aimed at encouraging other nations to adopt bigger cuts in their tuna catch quota, Kyodo said.